Consolidate Training Software: Why Teams Are Moving to One Platform

Consolidation of training software involves migrating your training operations from various independently acquired software solutions, LMS here, scheduling system there, invoicing added somewhere else, to a single solution that covers everything for you under one vendor relationship. It’s not just a repackaging or a user interface refresh. It’s about changing the structure of your training operations in terms of the number of software licenses, accounts, and systems you need to coordinate in order to deliver one training program.

In this article, we will discuss reasons for the current trend of consolidating training software, the specifics of training sprawl (which is quite different from generic SaaS sprawl), real costs of keeping a fragmented software stack (not just licensing fees), key requirements of consolidation (what to ask for), and importance of the procurement timing in this decision.

What Does “Consolidating Training Software” Actually Mean?

Consolidation of training software is the process of minimizing the number of contracted systems you use for your training operation to a single system that has built-in functionalities covering those that you needed in individual systems previously. Typically, for the majority of training providers this includes scheduling and attendance, learning management, instructor management, invoicing, certificates, and compliance reports.

This is an extension of a broader process taking place in software of any enterprise type, CIOs all over the world are analyzing their overly complicated tech stacks and simply trying to answer the question “Which of these systems do we need to run because we need them, and which do we need to run simply because we forgot to turn them off?”, training software does not escape this question despite its tendency to be one of the least reviewed parts of such stacks due to obvious reasons.

Consolidation is not about having less number of logins, it is about narrowing the gap between your training needs and what you have accumulated over time.

Why Are Training Teams Consolidating Around One Platform Right Now?

Consolidation is occurring in training teams now as the larger SaaS sprawl reckoning finally hits even traditionally untouched areas like L&D which have traditionally just bought whatever tools they needed with little oversight. What’s happening in training software is simply following the same trends occurring in enterprise software generally, and the statistics are impressive.

The typical company operates 106-118 SaaS applications, depending on which index you use, and until 2026 the number of applications has been consistently decreasing. However, the trend reversed and the number started increasing.
Moreover, the desire to consolidate doesn’t dissipate: 68% of tech leaders said that in 2026 they planned to consolidate their vendors and cut about 20% of them. Training software falls exactly into the sphere where the reckoning occurs not due to the bloated nature of that software but because there has never been any specific person looking at it.

Training software sprawl isn’t the result of any mistakes being made; it happens because no one has ever been assigned to monitor it.

What Does Training-Specific Software Sprawl Actually Look Like?

The sprawl specific to training is somewhat different from the general story about SaaS sprawl described in most consolidation literature, in that it does not normally involve five or six different point tools. Typically, there are just a few systems involved that were all required separately, but not intended to communicate with one another.

A classic configuration:

• LMS for delivering courses, tests, completions
• TMS for scheduling courses, assigning instructors, taking attendance in live training sessions
• Invoicing/payment solution, since neither LMS nor TMS was good at billing
• Certificate generation tool because none of the core solutions had flexible templates
• Reporting/BI layer because none of them provided the full picture.

General SaaS consolidation recommendations, based on use cases of five project management solutions or three overlapping chat apps, are hard to apply in this case. Sprawl in the area of training technology is about necessary, but separate tools, each doing its own job successfully and creating gaps in data flows between them.

This isn’t five tools doing the same thing poorly; it’s four or five doing things differently, while nobody takes care of what happens in between them.

What Does a Fragmented Training Stack Really Cost You?

While a scattered training stack is more expensive than the sum of all subscriptions, which itself is already a sizable sum, research conducted by Gartner revealed that average overspend on enterprise SaaS was 25% higher than what the organization needed to pay based on their usage of the software.

However, even when it comes specifically to training department expenses, the major cost is not in the extra number of licenses, but rather in the time spent on vendor management:

• Time necessary for contract renewal negotiations, multiplied by the number of vendors instead of one
• Increased security and compliance assessment costs, as each additional piece of software brings in additional vendor risks
• Increased support time due to the confusion about which of four or three interconnected systems an issue originates in
• Manual reconciliation of information between systems, which have different data models
• Onboarding process complications, training people to use several interfaces instead of one

All of these do not reflect in budget reports as a single entry, but rather as time wasted on vendor management instead of delivering training.

The license fees are the visible cost. The hours spent managing four vendor relationships instead of one are the cost nobody puts in the budget review.

What Should You Look for When Consolidating Onto One Training Platform?

When it comes to consolidation into a single platform, the purpose is not only to save logins, but make sure that the resulting platform has the full functionality of all those abandoned, not just the easiest to consolidate.

Here are some specific criteria:

• Does it provide the entire operational layer rather than just the content delivery component? The platform that solves the LMS sprawl but leaves all other components – scheduling, invoicing, certificates – in separate systems is not consolidating anything, it is simply transferring the problem.
• Is it really unified reporting? Or does the system require exporting the data from separate modules in order to build one report?
• What is the way for migrating content and historical data? A consolidation that requires complete rebuild of the content base and loses the history of compliance is not ideal.
• Does the contract actually solve anything? Is it one agreement rather than two or three, one renewal date and one point of accountability?
• Can it grow with you? So that this is not one more system that will need to get an add-on in eighteen months.

The test for real consolidation is not “did the number of logins go down,” but “did the number of places where a report could go wrong go down.”

How Does Procurement Timing Affect a Training Software Consolidation Decision?

Procurement timing plays a greater role in the decision-making process around training software consolidation than most literature acknowledges, as mid-contract switching to a new provider nearly always entails higher costs due to cancellation fees and disruptions to internal processes than waiting out a contract.

This needs to be taken into consideration from the very start:

• Determine renewal terms for your current contracts prior to beginning your consolidation evaluation and not after selecting a new vendor.
• Coordinate the release of your RFP and evaluation process so that you do not need to pay for both services for longer than absolutely necessary until your most expensive contract comes up for renewal.
• Use overlapping terms of your current contracts to your advantage. If both your LMS and TMS are coming up for renewal in the same month or quarter, there is a good opportunity to consolidate them at once.
• Your budgeting process will also play a role here. Consolidation decision may need budgetary approval, so it is critical that your RFP is scheduled with enough lead time to reach the approval point in time.
• Ignoring procurement timing is among the most frequent reasons why even a good consolidation decision gets delayed by 12 months due to no fault but bad planning.

The most optimal consolidation decision in the world will still end up being more expensive if it is made three months into a contract instead of three months before it is up for renewal.

What Actually Changes When You Move to One Platform, One Contract?

The difference between multiple platforms and one platform in one contract will change these three concrete things: who to contact when something stops working, where to find the right number when someone requests a report, and how many hours you spend managing tools rather than training.

• Single contract equals single date of renewal, single negotiations and single commercial responsibility, rather than keeping up with multiple contracts with different vendors on different cycles.
• Single source of truth means no need to reconcile numbers from multiple systems, there is only one place to check the completion number, attendance and compliance report.
• Single expert team means that you do not have to deal with multiple vendor support teams who only know a part of your training operations. You have one team who knows everything about your training operation, rather than four teams who know only a quarter of it.

Of course, all this does not mean that you do not have to manage anything, you still have to schedule, create content and manage instructors, but it means that you do not have to pay attention to making different systems agree with each other.

Would you like to see how one platform and one contract can look for your training program?

Talk to Our Team →

FAQs